Original Article

Evaluation of Susceptibility Status of Phlebotomus papatasi, the Main Vector of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, to Different WHO Recommended Insecticides in an Endemic Focus, Central Iran

Abstract

Background: Among neglected zoonotic diseases, leishmaniases caused by Leishmania parasite through infected female sand fly bite, are a group of diseases found in 98 countries and territories representing a critical burden of disease worldwide. Vector management plays a crucial role in reducing the burden of vector-borne diseases by WHO’s global plan. The objective of the current study was to assess the susceptibility status of wild phlebotomine sand flies from Esfahan Province, central Iran, to the recommended insecticides by WHO.
Methods: Sand flies were collected by mouth aspirator in Matin Abad desert Eco-resort and were tested using WHO adult mosquito test kit against Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) 4%, Deltamethrin 0.05%, Malathion 5% and Propoxur 0.1%. The number of knockdown sand flies were recorded during exposure time in ten minutes interval for DDT and Deltamethrin and they were allowed to recover for 24 hours. Knockdown Time50 (KD50) and KD90 were generated for them using Probit software. They were mounted and identified by valid keys.
Results: Among the tested insecticides against female Phlebotomus papatasi, DDT, Deltamethrin, and Malathion recorded the highest mortality rate of 100%, followed by Propoxur with 92.2% mortality for a one-hour exposure. For DDT, KD50 and KD90 were calculated 21.87 and 42.93 and for Deltamethrin, they were 23.74 and 56.50 minutes respectively. Total sand flies exposed with DDT  and Deltamethrin shed their leg(s).
Conclusion: It is concluded that Ph. papatasi from central Iran is susceptible to DDT, Deltamethrin, Malathion, and Propoxur.

1. World Health Organization (WHO), (2020) Neglected diseases, available at https://www.who.
int/neglected_diseases/zoonoses/infections_more /en/ (access 20 march 2020)
2. World Health Organization (WHO), (2020) Leishmaniases fact sheet, available at https://
www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/leishmaniasis - (access 20 march 2020)
3. World Health Organization (WHO), (2020) Leishmaniasis interactive timelines available at https://www.who.int/leishmaniasis/disease/ Leishmaniasis-interactive-timelines/en/ (access 20 march 2020)
4. World Health Organization (WHO), (2020) resources and publication available at https://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/CSR_ISR _2000_1leish/en/ (access 20 march 2020)
5. World Health Organization (WHO), (2020) Neglected diseases, Leishmaniasis available at
https://www.who.int/gho/neglected_diseases /leishmaniasis/en/ (access 20 march 2020)
6. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020) Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development
Goals – A road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. World Health Organization; annex 2Geneva..
7. World Health Organization (WHO) (2020) Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development
Goals – A road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. World Health Organization; Licence:
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO, Geneva..
8. Seyedi-Rashti MA, Yezdan-panah H, Shah Mohamadi H, Jedari M (1992) Susceptibility of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) to DDT in some foci of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 8(1): 99–100.
9. Yaghoobi-Erashadi MR, Javadian E (1995) Susceptibility status of Phelebotomus papatasito DDT in the most important focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis, Esfahan Province, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 24: 11–19.
10. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E (1993) Susceptibility of Phlebotomus papatasi to DDT in the most important focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis, Isfahan Province, Iran. J Entomol Soc Iran . 12: 27–37 (in Persian).
11. Aghasi M (1996) Present status of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Kerman, southeast Iran [MSPH thesis] School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran (in Persian).
12. Rassi Y, Javadian E (1998) The susceptibility to 4% DDT and host preference of the probable vectors of visceral leishmaniasis in northwest of Iran. Iran J Public Health. 27(1-2): 47–54.
13. Rassi Y, Jalali M, Vatandoost H (2000) Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus papatasi to DDT in Arsanjan County in Fars Province, Iran. Iran J Public Health. 29(1-4): 21–26.
14. Zahraei Ramezani AR, Yaghoobi- Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Abdoli H, Jafari R, Jalali Zand AR, Arandian MH, Shareghi N and Ghanei M (2008) Some ecological aspect of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Pchychodidae) in an endemic focus of ACL of Iran. J Entomol. 5(1): 17–23.
15. Afshar AA, Rassi Y, Sharifi I, Abai MR, Oshaghi MA, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Vatandoost H (2011) Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus papatasi and P. sergenti (Diptera: Psychodidae) to DDT and Deltamethrin in a focus of cutaneousleishmaniasis after earthquake strike in Bam, Iran. Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis. 5: 32–41.
16. Saeidi Z, Vatandoost H, Akhavan AA, YaghoobiErshadi MR, Rassi Y, Sheikh Z, Arandian MH, Jafari R, Sanei-Dehkordi AR (2012) Baseline susceptibility of a wild strain of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) to DDT and Pyrethroids in an endemic focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran. Pest Manag Sci. 68(5): 669–675.
17. Saeidi Z, Vatandoost H, Akhavan AA, YaghoobiErshadi MR, Rassi Y, Arandian MH, Jafari R (2013) Baseline insecticide susceptibility data of Phlebotomus papatasi in Iran, J Vector Borne Dis. 50: 57–61.
18. Shirani-Bidabadi L, Zahraei-Ramazani AR, Yaghoobi–Ershadi MR, Rassi Y, Akhavan AA, Oshaghi MA, Enayati AA, Saeidi Z, Jafari R, Vatandoost H (2017) Assessing the insecticide susceptibility status of field population of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a hyperendemic area of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Esfahan Province, Central Iran, Acta Trop. 176: 316–322.
19. Arzamani K, Vatandoost H, Rassi Y, Abai MR, Akhavan AA, Alavinia M, Akbarzadeh K, Mohebali M, Rafizadeh S (2017) Susceptibility status of wild population of Phlebotomus sergenti(Diptera: Psychodidae) to different imagicides in a endemic focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in northeast of Iran. J Vector Borne Dis. 54: 282–286.
20. Shirani-Bidabadi L, Zahraei-Ramazani AR, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Oshaghi MA, Enayati AA, Rassi Y, Gholampour F, Shareghi N, Madreseh E, Vatandoost H (2020) Monitoring of laboratory reared of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae), main vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis to different imagicides in hyper endemic areas, Esfahan Province, Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 14(1): 116–125.
21. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA, Shirzadi MR, Rassi Y, Khamesipour A, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Vatandoost H (2019) Conducting international diploma course on leishmaniasis and its control in the Islamic Republic of Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 13(3): 234–242.
22. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR (2016) Control of phlebotomine sand flies in Iran: a review article. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 10(4): 429–444.
23. World Health Organization (WHO) (2008) position statement on integrated vector management, World Health Org. Geneva.
24. World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) Global vector control response 2017–2030. World Health Org. Geneva.
25. World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) Global plan for insecticide resistance management in malaria vectors. World Health Org. Geneva.
26. World Health Organization (WHO) (2013) Test Procedures for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Malaria Vector Mosquito. World Health Org, Geneva.
27. World Health Organization (WHO) (2016) Test Procedures for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Malaria Vector Mosquito. World Health Org, Geneva .
28. World Health Organization (WHO) (2016) Test Procedures for Insecticide Resistance Monitoring in Malaria Vector Mosquito. 2nd ed. World Health Org. Geneva.
29. World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) 2010 WHO Report of a meeting of the WHO Expert Committee on the Control of Leishmaniases, World Health Org Geneva, 22–26.
30. Ernest Hodgson (2004) A textbook of modern toxicology, third edition, Department of Environmental and Biochemical Toxicology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey.
31. Wood RJ (1962) The effectiveness of insecticideimpregnated papers of different ages in the WHO adult mosquito test Kit. Bull World Health Org. Geneva 27: 306.
32. Pener H, Wilamovsky A (1987) Base‐line susceptibility of Phlebotomus papatasi to insecticides. Med Vet Entomol. 1(2):147–149.
33. El-Sayed S, Hemingway J, Lane RP ) 1989( Susceptibility baselines for DDT metabolism and related enzyme systems in the sandflyPhlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli) (Diptera: Psychodidae), Bull Entomol Res. 79(4) 679– 684.
34. Matinabad Desert Eco-Resort (2020) Website of Matinabad Desert Eco-Resort. Available at: https://matinabad.com/ (accessed 20 March 2020).
35. Abbott WS)1925(A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol.18: 265–267.
36. Seyedi-Rashti MA, Nadim A (1992 (The genus Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) of the countries of the Eastern Mediterranean region. Iran J Public Health. 21(1-4): 11–50.
37. Theodor O, Mesghali A (1964) On the Phlebotomine of Iran. J Med Entomol. 1:285–300.
38. Finney DJ)1971( Probit Analysis, 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Denlinger DS, Lozano-Fuentes S, Lawyer PHG, Black IV, WC, Bernhardt SA (2015) Assessing insecticide susceptibility of laboratory Lutzomyia longipalpis and Phlebotomus papatasi sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae). J Med Entomol. 52(5): 1003–1012.
40. Davies TGE, Field LM, Usherwood PNR, Williamson MS (2007) DDT, pyrethrin, pyrethroids, and insect sodium channels. IUBMB Life. 59: 151–162.
41. Mukhopadhyay AK, Sexena NBLK, Narasimhan MVVL (1992) Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes to DDT in some Kalaazar endemic districts of Bihar, India. Geneva, World Health Organization, (unpublished document WHO/CTD/VBC/ 92.995).
42. Singh R, Das RK, Sharma SK )2001( Resistance of sand flies to DDT in Kala-azar endemic districts of Bihar, India. Bull World Health Organ. 79(8): 793.
43. Gary ET, Abd el-baset BZ, Hanafi AH, Gregory MB, Brian CZ (2001( Susceptibility of sand flies to selected insecticides in North Africa and the Middle East. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 17 (l): 23–27.
44. Maroli M, Cianchi T, Bianchi R, Khoury C (2002( Testing insecticide susceptibility of Phlebotomus perniciosus and P. papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanità. 38 (4): 419–423.
45. Dinesh DS, Das ML, Picado A, Roy L, Rijal S, Singh SP 2010 Insecticide susceptibility of Phlebotomus argentipes in Visceral Leishmaniasis Endemic Districts in India and Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 4(10): e859.
46. Singh RK, Mittal PK, Dhiman RC) 2012( Insecticide susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes, a vector of visceral leishmaniasis in different foci in three states of India. J Vector Borne Dis. 49: 254–257.
47. Faraj C, Ouahabi S, Adlaoui EB, El Elkohli M, Lakraa L, El Rhazi M, Ameur B (2012)Insecticide susceptibility status of Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti and Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) papatasi in endemic foci of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Morocco. Parasit Vectors. 5: 51–57.
48. Hassan MM, Widaa SO, Osman OM, Numiary MS, Ibrahim MA, Abushama HM (2012( Insecticide resistance in the sand fly, Phlebotomus papatasi from Khartoum State, Sudan. Parasit Vectors. 5: 46–55.
49. Kumar V, Shankar L, Kesari S, Shankar Bhunia G, Singh D, Mandal R, Das P (2015) Insecticide susceptibility of phlebotomus argentipes & assessment of vector control in two districts of West Bengal, India. Indian J Med Res. 142: 211–215.
50. Selvakumar M, Srinivasan R (2015) Susceptibility status of Phlebotomus argentipes to DDT and deltamentrin in a focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in kani tribes settlement of the Western Ghats in Kerala, India. IntJ Curr Res. 7(08): 19564–19566.
51. Dhiman RC, Yadav RS (2016) Insecticide resistance in phlebotomine sandflies in Southeast Asia with emphasis on the Indian subcontinent. Infect Dis Poverty. 5: 106.
52. Nandi J, Chaudhuri I, Das C, Mukhopadhyay AK(2016) Susceptibility Status of Phlebotomus argentipes, to Synthetic Pyrethroid Insecticides in Kala Azar Endemic Parts of Bihar, India in Relation to Elimination of Visceral Leishmaniasis. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 7(4): 36–38.
53. Karakus M, Gocmen B, Özbel Y (2017) Insecticide susceptibility status of wild-caught sand fly populations collected from two leishmaniasis endemic areas in Western Turkey. J ArthropodBorne Dis. 11(1): 86–94.
54. Chowdhury R , Lal Das M, Chowdhury V, Roy L, Faria S, Priyanka J, Akter S, Prosad Maheswary N, Karim Khan R, Argaw D, Kroeger A (2018) Susceptibility of field-collected Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera: Psychodidae) sand flies from Bangladesh and Nepal to different insecticides. Parasit Vectors. 11: 336.
55. Mazzarri MB, Feliciangeli MD, Maroli M, Hernandez A, Bravo A (1997) Susceptibility of Lutzomyia longipalpis (diptera: psychodidae) to selected insecticides in an endemic focus of visceral leishmaniasis in Venezuela. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 13(4): 335–341.
56. Alexander B, Barros VC, de Souza SF, SS Barros, Teodoro LP, Soares ZR, Gontijo NF, Reithinger R (2009) Susceptibility to chemical insecticides of two Brazilian populations of the visceral leishmaniasis vector Lutzomyia longipalpis(Diptera: Psychodidae). Trop Med Int Health. 14: 1272–1277.
57. DÁvila Pessoa GC, Lopes JV, Rocha MF, Pinheiro LC, Luiz Rosa AC, Michalsky EM, Dias ES (2015) Baseline susceptibility to alpha-cypermethrin in Lutzomyia longipalpis (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) from Lapinha Cave (Brazil). Parasit Vectors. 8: 469.
58. Santamaría E, Marceló C (2019) Toxic activity of pyrethroids in Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Magdalena River basin, Colombia. Acta Biolo Colomb. 24(2): 391–396.
59. González MA, Bell1MJ, Bernhardt SA, Brazil RP, Dilger E, Courtenay O, Hamilton JGC (2019) Susceptibility of wild-caught Lutzomyialongipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) sand flies to insecticide after an extended period of exposure in western São Paulo, Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 12: 110.
60. The Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database, (2020) available at https://www.pesticideresistance.org/display.php?page=species&arId=676, access on 29 December 2020.
61. Singh R, Kumar P (2015) Susceptibility of the Sandfly Phlebotomus argentipes Annandale and Brunetti (Diptera: Psychodidae) to Insecticides in Endemic Areas of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Bihar, India. Jpn J Infect Dis. 68: 33–37.
62. Rama A, Kumar V, Kesari S, Singh V, Das P (2015) Monitoring Susceptibility Status of Phlebotomus argentipes (Diptera: Psychodidae) at Bihar (India) for the Procurement of Homozygous DDT Resistant Colony. J Trop Dis. 3: 4.
Files
IssueVol 15 No 4 (2021) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v15i4.10501
Keywords
Phlebotomus papatasi Insecticide Susceptibility Iran

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Saeidi Z, Vatandoost H, Zaim M, Ahmadkhaniha R, Rassi Y, Zahraei-Ramazani A, Arandian MH, Jafari R, Hubert Galan YJ, Sanei-Dehkordi A, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Akhavan AA. Evaluation of Susceptibility Status of Phlebotomus papatasi, the Main Vector of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, to Different WHO Recommended Insecticides in an Endemic Focus, Central Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2022;15(4):366-379.