Patients with Arthropod Bites and Stings Presenting to the Emergency Department: Clinical Features and Burden on the Emergency Department

Çağrı Safa Buyurgan; Ataman Köse; Seyran Bozkurt Babuş; Akif Yarkaç; Halil Oktay Usluer; Gülhan Orekici Temel

doi:10.18502/jad.v17i3.14988

Patients with Arthropod Bites and Stings Presenting to the Emergency Department: Clinical Features and Burden on the Emergency Department

Abstract

Background: There are few studies analyzing the epidemiological characteristics and clinical features of arthropod bites and stings, emergency department (ED) admission rate and cost burden. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features and ED burden of such cases.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 954 patients who presented to ED after exposure to arthropods. The demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment rates, consultation and hospitalization requirements, and costs were evaluated.
Results: The rate of presentation to the ED after exposure to arthropods was 0.36%. Among the identifiable insects, 25%, 22%, 5%, 3% and 1% patients were exposed to bees, ticks, scorpions, spiders, and centipedes, respectively. Of the included patients, 51% were male and the mean age was 39.4±14.8 years. Exposure to arthropods was most commonly seen in the summers (45%). Local and systemic toxicities developed in 11% and 1% of patients, respectively. Further examinations were requested in 50% of cases and 83% of cases received treatment. 4% of cases were hospitalized, and 21% were prescribed medicines.. The average cost per patient of exposure to spiders, scorpions, centipedes, ticks and bees were 45.5, 28.3, 17.3, 12.6, and 10.1 US Dollars, respectively. The total cost of ED for all patients was calculated as $12,694.65.
Conclusion: We believe that a better understanding of the characteristics and prevalence of arthropod bites and stings will have a positive impact on primary prevention, health resource planning and reducing the burden on EDs by improving people's knowledge and practices to reduce the incidence of bites and stings.

1. Langley R, Mack K, Haileyesus T, Proes- choldbell S, Annest JL (2014) National estimates of noncanine bite and sting in-juries treated in US hospital emergency departments, 2001–2010. Wilderness En-viron Med. 25(1): 14–23.
2. Kularatne S, Shahmy S, Rathnayake SS, Dawson AH (2018) Clinico-epidemiology of arthropod stings and bites in primary hospitals of north western province of Sri Lanka. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 56(10): 880–885.
3. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Zimmer-man A, Schauben JL (2016) 2015 Annual report of the American association of poison control centers’ national poison data system (NPDS): 33rd annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 54(10): 924–1109.
4. Özcan N, İkincioğulları D (2009) Ulusal zehir danışma merkezi 2008 yılı çalışma raporu özeti. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg. 66(ER-3): 29–58. (in Turkish)
5. Walker JP, Morrison R, Stewart R, Gore D (2013) Venomous bites and stings. Curr Probl Surg. 50(1): 9–44.
6. Clark S, Long AA, Gaeta TJ, Camargo Jr CA (2005) Multicenter study of emer-gency department visits for insect sting allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 116 (3): 643–649.
7. Vasievich MP, Villarreal JDM, Tomecki KJ (2016) Got the travel bug? a review of common infections, infestations, bites, and stings among returning travelers. Am J Clin Dermatol. 17(5): 451–462.
8. Langley RL (2012) Animal-related injuries resulting in emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the United States, 2006–2008. Hum Wild life Interact. 6 (1): 123–136.
9. Vaughn MG, Holzer KJ, Carbone JT, Salas-Wright CP (2019) Arthropod bites and stings treated in emergency depart-ments: recent trends and correlates. Wilderness Environ Med. 30(4): 394–400.
10. Newitt S, Elliot AJ, Morbey R, Durnall H, Pietzsch ME, Medlock JM, Leach S, Smith GE (2016) The use of syndromic survei-llance to monitor the incidence of ar-thropod bites requiring healthcare in Eng-land, 2000–2013: a retrospective ecologi-cal study. Epidemiol Infect. 144(11): 2251–2259.
11. Şahin A, Arıcı MA, Hocaoğlu N, Kal¬kan S, Tunçok Y (2018) Antivenom use in bite and sting cases presenting to a pub-lic hospital. Ulus Travma Acil Cer¬rahi Derg. 24(4): 343–350.
12. Goddard J (2012) Physician’s guide to ar-thropods of medical importance. 6th ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
13. Forrester JA, Weiser TG, Forrester JD (2018) An update on fatalities due to venomous and nonvenomous animals in the United States (2008–2015). Wilder-ness Environ Med. 29(1): 36–44.
14. Quan D (2012) North American poisonous bites and stings. Crit Care Clin. 28(4): 633–659.
15. Çağlar A, Köse H, Babayiğit A, Öner T, Duman M (2015) Predictive factors for determining the clinical severity of pe-diatric scorpion envenomation cases in Southeastern Turkey. Wilderness Envi-ron Med. 26(4): 451–458.
16. Adams A, Sutton JP, Elixhauser A (2012) Emergency department visits and hospi-talizations associated with animal inju-ries, 2009. Review from agency for health-care research and quality (US), Rockville (MD).

Files	XML PDF (912KB)
Issue	Vol 17 No 3 (2023)
Section	Original Article
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v17i3.14988
Keywords
Bee Cost Emergency department Tick Toxicity

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Buyurgan Çağrı, Köse A, Bozkurt Babuş S, Yarkaç A, Usluer H, Orekici Temel G. Patients with Arthropod Bites and Stings Presenting to the Emergency Department: Clinical Features and Burden on the Emergency Department. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2024;17(3):287–298.

Vancouver

Download Citation